The Summer Meeting That Created AI
This is the second part in our blog series on AI's developmental history, Minds and Machines
In 1956, a small group of scientists coined "artificial intelligence" during a summer workshop that launched humanity's most ambitious technological pursuit.
World-changing ideas often begin simply. "We propose that a 2-month, 10-man study of artificial intelligence be carried out," read the 1955 proposal that launched an entire field. The Dartmouth Summer Project marked the pivotal moment when scattered efforts to create thinking machines became a recognized scientific discipline.
What made this particular gathering so influential wasn't just the brilliant minds it assembled, but the audacious vision they shared: that human intelligence could be precisely described and simulated by machines.
The Bold Proposal's Origins
The seed for the historic Dartmouth workshop was planted by John McCarthy, then a young mathematician at Dartmouth College. Frustrated by the scattered nature of work on thinking machines, McCarthy envisioned bringing key researchers together to establish a unified field.
His proposal, co-authored with Marvin Minsky, Nathaniel Rochester, and Claude Shannon, outlined a radical vision:
"The study is to proceed on the basis of the conjecture that every aspect of learning or any other feature of intelligence can in principle be so precisely described that a machine can be made to simulate it," wrote McCarthy and his colleagues in their 1955 proposal titled "A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence."
This ambitious framing represented a profound shift from seeing computers as mere calculating machines to viewing them as potential repositories of genuine intelligence. The proposal listed seven aspects of intelligence they hoped to explore, including natural language, neural nets, and machine learning—terms that remain central to AI today.
Perhaps most consequential was the group's decision, with McCarthy taking the lead, to name this nascent field "artificial intelligence." By choosing this term over alternatives like cybernetics or automata studies, they established a bold benchmark against which progress would be measured: nothing less than the recreation of human-like intelligence in machines.
Summer Conversations That Shaped AI
When the workshop convened in the summer of 1956, it brought together an extraordinary collection of scientific talent. Beyond the four organizers, participants included computer pioneer Herbert Simon, information theorist Ray Solomonoff, and cognitive scientist Allen Newell, among others.
The Dartmouth gathering had a relaxed atmosphere. Researchers arrived and departed throughout the summer months. They shared early research informally, engaged in spontaneous debates, and explored foundational ideas through casual conversations.
Despite the casual format—or perhaps because of it—the workshop generated several breakthrough ideas. Most notably, Allen Newell and Herbert Simon arrived with their Logic Theorist program, which could prove mathematical theorems through reasoning processes similar to those used by humans. This program, often considered the first true artificial intelligence, demonstrated that machines could perform tasks requiring what appeared to be genuine thought.
Not all participants shared the same vision, however. While some emphasized formal logic approaches, others advocated for neural networks inspired by brain structure. This tension between symbolic and connectionist approaches would shape AI research for decades to come.
Setting an Ambitious Course
The immediate aftermath of Dartmouth saw an explosion of AI research activity. Armed with a new field identity and a clear mission, participants returned to their institutions and established some of the first dedicated AI laboratories.
McCarthy went on to MIT where he created the AI Lab (later joined by Minsky), while others established AI research programs at Carnegie Mellon, Stanford, and elsewhere. These centers became the backbone of early AI development, attracting both talented researchers and substantial funding.
The workshop's framing of key problems guided research priorities for years afterward. From game playing to natural language processing, the core challenges identified at Dartmouth became standard problems against which progress was measured.
Perhaps most significantly, the optimistic timeframe suggested at Dartmouth—that significant progress could be made in a single summer—set a pattern of enthusiasm that characterized early AI. This optimism helped secure crucial funding but also established expectations that would prove difficult to meet.
Dartmouth's Lasting Influence
Nearly seven decades later, the Dartmouth workshop's influence remains evident across AI. The fundamental questions raised that summer still drive research today—from knowledge representation to machine learning and reasoning systems.
The workshop's framing of AI as recreating human mental capabilities continues to shape how we evaluate AI systems, including today's debates about whether large language models truly "understand" text.
With historical perspective, we can also identify the vision's blind spots. Participants underestimated their task's difficulty and didn't foresee how statistical, data-driven methods would eventually surpass the symbolic, rule-based approaches they favored.
The Birth of a Field
The Dartmouth workshop's main contribution wasn't technical but organizational: it created AI as a distinct field with its own identity and research community.
By naming this new discipline, the participants united previously scattered research efforts under a common banner with shared terminology and challenges.
The workshop's core ideas—that machines could be intelligent and that this intelligence could be engineered—continue to influence AI development today, from chess engines to large language models.